Performasi Metode Kecerdasan Buatan (FA, PSO, ACO, GWO, dan OPA) Untuk Penalaan PID Pada Pengendalian Level Air
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56795/fortech.v5i2.5208Keywords:
PID tuning, Metaheuristics, Water Level Control System, Actuator Saturation, ITAEAbstract
Water level control is a critical problem in various industrial processes, such as water treatment, power generation, chemical industry, and irrigation. Although proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controllers are widely used due to their simple structure and ease of implementation, determining the parameters Kp, Ki, and Kd remains challenging for systems with nonlinear dynamics and actuator limitations. This study presents a comparative evaluation of five population-based metaheuristic algorithms—Firefly Algorithm (FA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), and Orca Predation Algorithm (OPA)—for automatic tuning of PID parameters in a second-order water tank model with actuator saturation of ±5 pu. The objective function employed is the Integral of Time-multiplied Absolute Error (ITAE) with an overshoot penalty. The comparison was conducted under identical conditions, including population size, number of iterations, parameter search ranges, initial conditions, and objective function. Simulation results demonstrate that ACO-PID achieves the lowest ITAE value of 0.2352 and the fastest settling time of 1.32 s. FA-PID, GWO-PID, and OPA-PID yield closely comparable performance, whereas PSO-PID produces zero overshoot at the expense of the highest ITAE value of 0.2668 and the longest settling time of 1.66 s. The execution times of all five algorithms are relatively similar, ranging from 4.84 to 5.16 s. These findings indicate that ACO is the most suitable method for the plant configuration and objective function examined in this study; however, the performance differences among ACO, FA, GWO, and OPA are relatively small and cannot be considered statistically significant without multi-run testing and statistical analysis.
References
M. Ali, A. N. Afandi, A. Parwati, R. Hidayat, and C. Hasyim, “DESIGN OF WATER LEVEL CONTROL SYSTEMS USING PID AND ANFIS BASED ON FIREFLY ALGORITHM,” JEEMECS (Journal Electr. Eng. Mechatron. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.26905/jeemecs.v2i1.2804.
M. Siswanto, S. Arfaah, R. Rukslin, M. Muhlasin, and M. Ali, “Rekonfigurasi 33 Kanal Irigasi Menggunakan Metode Firefly Algorithm (MFA),” J. FORTECH, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 43–47, 2023, doi: 10.56795/fortech.v4i1.4106.
M. H. Reza, K. Erwansyah, and L. Lusiyanti, “Monitoring Tangki Air Berbasis Internet Of Things,” J. Sist. Komput. Triguna Dharma (JURSIK TGD), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 139–146, 2023, doi: 10.53513/jursik.v2i2.7370.
S. B. Joseph, E. G. Dada, A. Abidemi, D. O. Oyewola, and B. M. Khammas, “Metaheuristic algorithms for PID controller parameters tuning: review, approaches and open problems,” 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09399.
M. Hasib Al Isbilly, Markhaban Siswanto, and Machrus Ali, “Optimasi PID Kontroller Pada Sistem Pengaturan Irigasi Menggunakan Metode Bat Algorithm,” J. JEETech, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 78–83, 2022, doi: 10.48056/jeetech.v3i2.198.
B. Budiman and M. Ali, “PID Controller Design for Heating Furnace Temperature Based on Bat Algorithm (BA),” JEEMECS (Journal Electr. Eng. Mechatron. Comput. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 45–50, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.26905/jeemecs.v6i1.9307.
Hidayatul Nurohmah, M. Ali, Rukslin, Dwi Ajiatmo, and Muhammad Agil Haikal, “Komparasi PID, FLC, dan ANFIS sebagai Kontroller Dual Axis Tracking Photovoltaic berbasis Bat Algorithm,” J. JEETech, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 71–77, 2022, doi: 10.48056/jeetech.v3i2.197.
Muhammad Agil Haikal, Dandy Tulus Herlambang, Machrus Ali, and Muhlasin, “Desain Optimasi PID Controller Pada Heating Furnace Temperature Menggunakan Metode Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO),” ALINIER J. Artif. Intell. Appl., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 77–82, 2021, doi: 10.36040/alinier.v2i2.5162.
M. Ali Fikri Haiqal, Rukslin, D. Ajiatmo, and M. Ali, “Optimasi Thermal Oil Heater Menggunakan ACO Sebagai Tunning PID Controller,” Nucl. J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, May 2023, doi: 10.32492/nucleus.v2i1.2101.
Febrian Rizal Anas, Dwi Ajiatmo, Hidayatul Nurohmah, and M. Ali, “Desain Controller Pada Heating Furnace Berbasis Metode Firefly Algorithm (FA),” Nucl. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 70–78, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.32492/nucleus.v1i2.1202.
V. Kusuma Apsari, M. Ali, H. Nurohmah, and R. Rukslin, “Desain Optimasi PID Controller Pada Temperatur Heating Furnace Berbasis Ant Colony Algorithm (ACO),” J. FORTECH, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 57–62, 2023, doi: 10.56795/fortech.v2i2.204.
S. Mirjalili, S. M. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis, “Grey Wolf Optimizer,” Adv. Eng. Softw., vol. 69, pp. 46–61, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007.
Y. Jiang, Q. Wu, S. Zhu, and L. Zhang, “Orca predation algorithm: A novel bio-inspired algorithm for global optimization problems,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 188, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116026.
N. Mittal, U. Singh, and B. S. Sohi, “Modified Grey Wolf Optimizer for Global Engineering Optimization,” Appl. Comput. Intell. Soft Comput., vol. 2016, 2016, doi: 10.1155/2016/7950348.
M. M. Emam, H. A. El-Sattar, E. H. Houssein, and S. Kamel, “Modified orca predation algorithm: developments and perspectives on global optimization and hybrid energy systems,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 35, no. 20, pp. 15051–15073, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00521-023-08492-2.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Izzatul Umami, Asnun Parwanti, Machrus Ali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
